Professional
Screenwriters know the benefit of industry
standard coverage and how it translates
to the bottom line—script sales. Before
you submit your screenplay to anyone in
the entertainment industry, make sure you
first get professional coverage with story
notes and analysis from seasoned industry
veterans. This is foundational to your success
as a working Motion Picture & Television
Screenwriter. Never seek or rely on professional
input or opinions from friends or family.
And remember, there’s a big difference
between professional coverage analysis and
industry standard studio coverage. See Studio
coverage below.
Perhaps the best way through the doors
of Hollywood is to have Agents, Producers,
Production Companies and Studio Executives
calling you to read your script? All feature
length screenplays (member or nonmember)
officially covered by the Screenwriters
Federation of America (or any approved affiliates)
receiving a greenlit (consider or recommend)
grade will be eligible for publication in
SFA’s Greenlit Market. The SFA is
proud of its proactive stance as a market
maker in the spec script market worldwide.
This is an invaluable service to Screenwriters
and the Television & Motion Picture
Industry at large. Screenwriters Federation
of America is the quintessential resource
for scripts that have been professionally
covered and made the grade. We are staking
our reputation on it.
Screenplays selected will be asked to provide
a professional synopsis and logline of their
script to be published alongside our official
SFA coverage grading report. There are no
listing fees for greenlit SFA Member or
nonmember scripts. In the event Screenwriters
Federation of America enables the eventual
sale (or option for sale) of a screenplay
published traditionally (via SFA publications)
or digitally (via SFA website), the SFA
will NOT collect any fees from the gross
proceeds of any such sale. There are no
commissions due SFA for sales—member
or nonmember, it matters not. Screenwriters
who have put in the work and made the grade,
deserve the opportunity to be read—one
and all. Our mission is to provide the marketplace
with Federation sanctioned, professionally
covered, greenlit scripts. A milestone for
the Screenwriter and the Television and
Motion Picture Industry at large.
Greenlit Market Selection Criteria: Our
focus is on solid writing, great storytelling,
story structure and proper screenplay format.
We are not here to make judgments on current
trends. That's Hollywood's job. We are here
to make sure you have a polished "reading
script" not James Cameron's shooting
script.
SFA PROFESSIONAL
COVERAGE/ANALYSIS - FEES & SERVICES
Screenwriters Federation of America’s
Coverage/Analysis service is available to
both member and nonmember Screenwriters
worldwide. Non-member fee is $550, SFA Member
fee is $425. Coverage/Analysis fees include
up to 120 pages and $2.00 per page thereafter.
Upon submission an approved SFA Analyst
will be matched to your script based on
its genre. The assigned Analyst will read
it, analyze it and make any necessary notes
or comments directly on the script pages.
This immensely improves the communication
between Screenwriter and Analyst. Next,
the Analyst will evaluate and grade your
script according to the industry standard
coverage scorecard shown below. In addition
to the standard categories, the Analyst
will also grade your script for proper screenplay
format. This is not done by industry coverage
readers. After grading your script the Analyst
will write a professional logline of your
screenplay, but may however, not elect to
dwell on the proverbial coverage synopsis.
This is a matter each Analyst’s personal
style. All Analyst’s will generate
a freestyle report/analysis that resembles
something akin to studio-style development
notes, story analysis and a Screenwriting
Professor's communiqué. The size
of the analysis will vary based on the condition
and the complexity of the material.

STANDARD STUDIO
COVERAGE
Studio Coverage reports are prepared by
industry readers for independent and studio
acquisition and development executives,
directors and producers who do not have
time to read every spec script submitted
to their companies. It's a general screening
processes whereas the reader fills out a
simple report card rating the script from
poor to excellent as shown below. In addition,
the reader writes a 1-3 sentence logline
and a 1-5 page synopsis of the screenplay
as an attachment to the report. Most importantly
(the Holy Grail), the reader makes a personal
judgment to either: consider, recommend,
or pass on your project. Ninety-nine percent
(99%) of the time the reader elects to pass.
To make matters worse, most studios, agencies,
and production companies keep a database
of Screenwriters they have covered. If you
end up in their rejection database, good
luck trying to get back in. Don’t
waste your shot with a Studio, Producer,
Agent or that one individual who could have
changed your professional life.
| |
Poor |
Fair |
Good |
Excellent |
| Premise |
|
|
X |
|
| Story
Line |
X |
|
|
|
| Characterization |
|
X |
|
|
| Dialogue |
X |
|
|
|
| Production
Value |
|
X |
|
|
|
Pass
X |
Consider |
Recommend |
Who are these so called Hollywood readers?
Well, one things for sure—they're
not the high-powered gatekeepers to Hollywood.
Typically, they're interns, students, film
school graduates, aspiring screenwriters,
etc., who are burdened with reading ten
or more scripts a week at modest remuneration.
Some are freelance readers who work out
of their homes and receive a mere $25-$50
per script. Needless to say, they're not
the Hollywood moguls and deal-makers you'd
love to have read your script. But, unless
you have the personal contacts to go straight
to the top, you have to go through them.
LET'S GET IT ALL
OUT. THE YIN & YANG OF STUDIO COVERAGE.
Yin: Unfortunately, due to the nature of
the beast, most industry coverage readers
play it safe by passing on virtually every
project they see. It's the safe, easy, standard,
"fit-in" thing to do. One must
understand the potential consequences of
considering or recommending a script—someone
higher-up the food chain will read it. Consequently,
if the next reader (their boss) doesn't
like the script—it potentially opens
the door to wondering if the first level
reader is even capable of recognizing a
valuable project. And, there's something
about development professionals being forced
to read a bad script that causes anarchy
and disdain. Somehow, the "risk verses
reward" factor just isn't worth it
for most coverage readers. It's safer just
to engage in cynical repartee and pass.
After all, anyone can tear something down.
But, how many can actually create something,
or take a stand for something they believe
in? Don't get us wrong, we are not saying
all coverage readers and work scenarios
fall into this category. However, in a very
general sense, we believe this reflection
is sadly accurate. Bottom line: your reading
script must have flawless technical format
and precision story structure for a reader
to risk everything by considering your project.
Yang: There are many sincere and talented
professional coverage readers who would
absolutely love to read a great script and
recommend it with great enthusiasm and conviction.
Unfortunately, the vast majority (90+%)
of the scripts they read are deplorable,
dreadful, horrifying, unbearable and as
bad as bad can be. A wise man once said,
"you're never a loser until you blame
others for your shortcomings." Generally,
it’s not the industry reader’s
fault. Do your homework. You don't pick
up a guitar and just play it. You go through
a lot of pain and practice. Screenwriting
is no different. Aspirant Screenwriters
are notorious for diving-in and writing
their first script with minuscule focus
on the art and craft of story structure
and screenplay format. And, to make matters
worse, they all think they've just written
the next Hollywood blockbuster. We recently
heard from a veteran industry reader who
sadly stated that out of the last three
hundred (300) scripts they covered, they
only liked two (2). You do the math…
and while you're at it, carefully considered
their deliberate usage of the word "liked",
as opposed to "loved."
|